Ethical investigation of cognitive errors of seminary users in social networks

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 University of Tehran

2 Baqir al-Olum University

10.22034/ethics.2025.51480.1693

Abstract

One of the most important errors of activism in social networks is cognitive errors, which will lead to unethical behavior. This study aims to investigate the effect of cognitive errors on the activism of seminary users on social networks, using a qualitative research method and semi-structured interviews with 16 seminary specialists and media experts. The necessity of this study stems from the sensitive role of seminary users in propagating religion and the effect of cognitive errors on their behavior and decision-making on social networks. Cognitive errors, as illogical and exaggerated thinking patterns, can have negative effects on users' decision-making and behavior in the media. The study of four cognitive errors: all-or-nothing, hasty conclusions, exaggerated generalization, mental filter, and the moral harms caused by them in the activism of students on social networks are among the findings of the research in this study. The findings of the study showed that the occurrence of these cognitive errors by religious activists leads to incorrect judgments, unfair interpretations, and irrational reactions on social media. These errors not only reduce the credibility of religious users, but also lead to the incorrect promotion of religious values. Suggested solutions include the use of cognitive-behavioral therapy CBT, promotion

Keywords

Main Subjects

Journal of Moral Studies

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 20 April 2025

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics