نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه مدرسی اخلاق اسلامی دانشکده الهیات و ادیان دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران
2 گروه معارف، دانشکده الهیات و ادیان، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Qurb Ilahi is not merely the ultimate telos of human conduct, but also the foundational criterion for moral valuation in a substantial body of Islamic ethical theories. Nevertheless, the multiplicity of ethical schools within the Islamic tradition is occasionally misconstrued as theoretical incompatibility. To address this gap, the present study re-examines six prominent theories—intrinsic goodness and badness, the ideal observer, innatism, divine command, Tabatabai's theory of I'tibariyat, and natural law—as "moral readings of divine proximity." Utilizing a descriptive-analytical approach based on library research, this study compares the aforementioned readings across four central parameters: the criterion of moral value, the epistemological source of values, the definition of divine proximity, and the practical method of attaining it. Comparative findings reveal that the differences among these perspectives are not irreconcilable foundational contradictions; rather, they originate from varying "levels of analysis" and distinct focal points regarding different dimensions of the human being. The primary innovation and achievement of this paper is the introduction of a "longitudinal and layered integrated model" wherein the ontological, legislative, conventional, and observational domains are systematically aligned in a continuum. This formulation demonstrates that these readings are not mutual rivals, but rather complementary components of a coherent "proximity-centric" ethical system.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)