نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 طلبه سطح 4، دانشجوی دکتری فلسفه و کلام اسلامی دانشگاه قم
2 استاد حوزه علمیه، دانشجوی ارشد جامعه شناسی، دانشگاه باقرالعلوم
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Despite the significance of practical reason (al-ʿaql al-ʿamalī) in Islamic sciences, its position relative to other jurisprudential evidences (adilla) remains understudied. This article examines the various interactions between rational decrees (aḥkām ʿaqlī) and other evidences, emphasizing the principles of Ayatollah Mohammad Baqir al-Sadr (Shahid Sadr). After outlining foundational frameworks for assessing rational decrees, eight types of interactions are identified based on three criteria: 1) whether the intersecting evidence is rational (ʿaqlī) or textual (naqlī), 2) alignment (hamsūyī) or conflict (tanāfī) between them, and 3) their occurrence in legislative enactment (majal-e jaʿl) or practical compliance (majal-e emteṯāl). Interactions in compliance are clarified through conflict resolution principles. When rational and textual evidences overlap legislatively, the potential role of rational decrees as contextual clues (qarīna) and the guiding nature (irshādī) of textual evidence must be considered. According to mainstream Shia thought, non-prima facie conflicts between rational decrees and other evidences in legislation are precluded, as practical reason inherently prioritizes textual evidence. This analysis underscores the dynamic interplay of rational and revelatory sources in Islamic legal theory.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)