نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانش آموخته دکتری موسسه آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی. استاد مقطع خارج حوزه علمیه قم
2 دانشجوی دکتری رشته فلسفه اخلاق دانشگاه قم
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Ethics is concerned with evaluating actions and traits that have a lasting, enhancing or diminishing impact on human perfection. In comparing the disciplines of ethics and jurisprudence and examining the relationships that may exist between them, three main axes are typically considered: subject matter, methodology, and purpose. Based on foundational principles such as the definition and aim of ethics, it appears that the field of ethics shares thematic, methodological, and especially teleological proximity with jurisprudence.
An analysis of various issues and propositions within jurisprudence clearly demonstrates that its aims inherently lead the obligated individual toward a degree of human perfection. Consequently, given the subject and purpose of ethics, and the inherent link between jurisprudential aims and the attainment of human perfection, jurisprudential rulings yield corresponding ethical judgments. This correlation is conditional and assumes the absence of obstacles—such as rulings derived from procedural principles (uṣūl ʿamaliyyah) that do not aim at achieving perfection. By identifying the barriers that prevent jurisprudential rulings from leading to human perfection, it becomes evident that, in the absence of such barriers, these rulings entail the derivation of aligned ethical judgments.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)